Science

3157 readers

1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Bite mark analysis has no basis in science, experts now say. Why is it still being used in court? (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Same with finger prints, ballistics, and a shit load of other pseudo science.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I don't think that the uniqueness of fingerprints is in doubt, but their analysis and use might not be up to snuff. I've read numerous articles over the last couple of decades that call into question at least the statistical underpinnings of what it means to declare a match.

But law enforcement in general seems to be filled with pseudoscience, from profiling and interview techniques to body language and lie detection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What about psychics and lue detector tests.