this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1902 points (90.2% liked)

Political Memes

5615 readers
1503 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Most of what you've described are things Congress does, not the president. I highly doubt the quality of your research.

Plus, if you had done proper research, you'd see that the Inflation Reduction Act was actually such a productive climate action that it forced Canada and European countries to pass similar legislation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the Inflation Reduction Act was actually such a productive climate action

Every year since the passage of the Act has seen an increase in gross carbon emissions both domestically and when combined with Canada and Europe. We crested the 2 C mark for several months in 2023, half a decade sooner than expected, despite its passage. US production and consumption of fossil fuels has increased. New well drilling is at its fastest pace since pre-COVID. O&G companies made record profits and have rededicated a big chunk of that new wealth into propagandizing against additional climate change reforms, both domestically and globally.

Uh... yay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Every year since the passage of the Act

It hasn't even been 2 years.

There's an important lesson here too -- actions that we take today will not have an observable effect until months later. Everything has a lag time. It'll probably take 3 years until we see the start of the Act's impacts, 5 until they become obvious.

You mentioned increased emissions in Europe, and Germany is a fantastic example of this effect. They created a moratorium on nuclear energy years ago, and many reactors were shuttered these past few years. They've also been burning more coal now, year over year. And they had to temporarily increase energy imports from France... Which was largely nuclear generated. I think we'll see in the coming years that Germany gained nothing from closing nuclear plants, and will probably lag because of it too.

We could've stopped all pollution with the IRA, and we still would've hit +2C early. The trends are already in motion and will take time to reverse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

It hasn’t even been 2 years.

You: "The Inflation Reduction Act has made huge improvements against the threat of climate change"

Me: "Nothing has improved. In fact, things have gotten significantly worse."

You: "Obviously, but that's just because the Inflation Reduction Act hasn't done anything yet!"

:-|

You mentioned increased emissions in Europe, and Germany is a fantastic example of this effect. They created a moratorium on nuclear energy years ago

Which was in response to the Fukushima failure and the recognition among European countries that all their nuclear hardware was well outside its maintenance limit. So, instead of retrofitting and repairing these facilities, they shut them down and switched to imported natural gas as a short-term cheap substitute.

Ironically enough, the biggest contributor to reductions in Greenhouse emissions in Europe has been the Russia-Ukraine War. Thanks Mysterious Climate Activist for blowing up Nordstrem II. Total game changer!

So I guess, in that regard, you can give Biden credit for reducing carbon emissions. But that's got nothing to do with the IRA.

We could’ve stopped all pollution with the IRA, and we still would’ve hit +2C early.

We could have stopped pollution with the IRA and it would have radically reduced the rate at which we are heating up the planet.

Instead, we implemented a policy that has resulted in increased pollution since it was implemented.

We played this game with Obama back in 2009. He promised a bunch of measures to reduce carbon emissions. He failed to take direct action as chief executive and he let Republicans kill his climate legislation when he had a 60 vote Dem majority. What middling bullshit he did pass - in the direct aftermath of a massive oil spill in the Gulf - failed to curb development of the enormous gas fields across the Southwest and Great Plains.

And now the US has grown its O&G development industry into a world leader, drastically increasing the volume of emissions globally thanks to both domestic consumption and foreign exports.

I have seen nothing to suggest the IRA isn't on the exact same trajectory.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, when something good happens: It’s Biden. But, when something bad happens: It’s Congress.

Schrödinger’s Government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, you're correct. It's primarily a victory of Congress. One that Biden argued for, yes, but one he ultimately did not accomplish.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then it’s a fait accompli and no one should be upset when Biden loses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't need Biden to win, I need Trump to lose. I'm all ears on other ways to make that happen.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lenin was acutely conscious of the dangers of parliamentary cretinism: socialists treating parliament as the primary arena of struggle and subordinating everything to its priorities. This would bend socialists’ politics towards compromise with capitalism and also their practical orientation to parliamentary manoeuvring. He was equally alert to the problem of voter fetishism: voters mistakenly thinking the vote is an exercise of power, when in fact power in a capitalist society is collective, social and located largely outside the parliamentary realm. Elections had a place, but they were no substitute for mass working-class action in the workplaces, streets and squares. Ultimately power must be wrested from the capitalist class in revolution. Source

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And in becoming so focused on identifying pitfalls against combating capitalism, some of which were completely hypothetical and theoretical, Lenin became blind to the consequences of the attained power consequently corrupting purported socialists.

The USSR was a failure of revolutionists to correctly wield the power they had attained, and instead of controlling it, it controlled them. Lenin was so focused on wresting power from capitalists that he did not consider safeguards on that power.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Death does tend to limit one’s control over social situations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

He was alive to see the revolution succeed and the Bolsheviks take power, and remained healthy and in power for a few years. He didn't set up a strong, foundational government.