this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
40 points (90.0% liked)
World News
32075 readers
1142 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, sure, there are no stockpiles hidden somewhere by secret services or criminal enterprises. 🤔
Thus the quotes.
This is still pretty big, though. I imagine further legislation will be easier if the negotiators can say that legally nobody has any chemical weapons right now.
Of course, I'm sure there's facilities that could start making them in a hurry.
Also, the world at least claiming there aren’t any may increase the political costs of their use. Any country that wants to use them will face the backlash or being the “only one” to have them, even if it may not technically be the truth.
You say that as if they are two separate things.
Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if the big players have replaced chemical weapons with something just as horrible but more "smart" like micro-drones with explosive charges and facial recognition.