this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
5565 readers
2 users here now
c/formula1
Welcome to c/formula1.
Rules
Please keep discussions civil, respect other's opinions, and keep it friendly. Please read our rules before posting in our community.
Rules TLDR
- No spoilers in post titles please. Use of spoiler tags is considered a courtesy for now.
- No piracy discussion.
- Keep it on topic.
- No memes.
Resources
These sites are a good place to start finding out about Formula 1, aside from right here of course!
Formula1.com - the official Formula 1 website.
Formula 1 Youtube - the official F1 youtube channel.
Liquipedia Overview - what's happening now and next in a nice dashboard.
F1Calendar.com - never miss a session again!
F1Countdown.com - for those of you who like countdowns!
Sister Communities
!Motorsports - for the love of racing outside of Formula 1.
[email protected] - because you love memes.
[email protected] - let's race!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thank you for quoting the article.
I was wondering why McLaren stuck with the hards but that reasoning makes sense. Still not sure why they went with the hards in the first place though. The race was well over half finished and they could have completed it on softs. In the end I don't think it changed anything but curious nonetheless.
I'm guessing one reason was that they had new hards available, but only scrub softs.
I wonder if they were concerned about their deg with softs since Silverstone is typically a high deg track. Maybe they didn't do any long runs in FP and didn't have the data to show that they could last 20+ laps.