this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
211 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
480 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a strawman.

You cannot act as though feeding LLMs data is remotely comparable to reading.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because reading is an inherently human activity.

An LLM consuming data from a training model is not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LLMs forcing us to take a look at ourselves and see if we're really that special.

I don't think we are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

For now, we're special.

LLMs are far more training data-intensive, hardware-intensive, and energy-intensive than a human brain. They're still very much a brute-force method of getting computers to work with language.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the LLM is also outputting the copyrighted material.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So could any human that got inspired by something...