this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
2556 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
2048 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This seems like a good place so far tbh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if that could be built into it. Reddit was not a very useful place for information in 2011. Then the communities came.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, I may be totally misunderstanding the problem.

If it’s just that lemmy needs time and interaction from the community to build that knowledge, then great! No problem. But what I understood was that lemmy’s communities and conversations simply aren’t made accessible to wide-searching like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looking at the /robots.txt file on a few different instances, there's nothing preventing Google or any other web crawlers from indexing Lemmy. I was even able to find some posts by searching site:lemmy.ml.

I think part of it is that all the separate instances make for bad SEO. And there just isn't enough content here yet to compete with Reddit and other search rankings. Hopefully it'll keep growing and eventually take over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, sounds like I did misunderstand. I’m happy to be wrong, thanks for explaining!