this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
310 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
5543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

About 59% of Americans say TikTok a threat to the national security of the United States, according to a new survey of U.S. adults.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both really don't matter, since adults have a right to chose to consume any content they'd like.

If your grandma finds Q fascinating, that's on your grandma

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's also the fault of those producing Q content.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it isn't. Every demand will find a seller. That's just how reality works.

The overwhelming majority of "radical" content creators are just riding a grift train.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you agree, they are also at fault.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. Snake oil salesmen are not to blame for people craving snake oil. They're merely filling the demand gap

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Explain why people want novel new things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your saying that the supply caused a demand?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I'm literally saying the opposite. You cannot manufacture demand

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hahhaa ok sure, buddy. Big news for advertising.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we can manufacture demand, then supply-side economics is the way to go, full stop. Youre a big fan of Reagan, I take it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not the implication of the ability to make others want things. Also, I clearly stated that the fault lies with both the producer of materials and the consumer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Advertising does work, yes, but only for products in which demand already exists. No significant amount of people will buy a hand-cutting-off machine no matter how it is advertised.

The radicalization began decades ago, initially couched in racial resentment, and has spread largely via Americans' innate dissatisfaction with government, which goes back literally hundreds of years.

This resentment has certainly been fostered, even engineered, and I would separate those who have directly engineered or manipulated such resentment (e.g. Benghazi trials, trans panic, Critical Race Theory) with those who merely profit from it.

Two very different groups, imo.