this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1462 points (98.9% liked)
People Twitter
5401 readers
1516 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think this is a tongue-in-cheek jab at the very real issue of men who try to write women who literally don't have any women in their lives except possibly their mothers.
Hm. Completely missed that, but then I don’t read articles about what women want.
Is that actually a very real issue, or is just another stereotype? The whole thing is so meta.
A little of both. I think it was a more common issue a few decades ago and I know it was a common theme on the internet in the 2000s now that a new generation discovers it over and over it kind of perpetuates as a stereotype but I know male writers are so much better about it today than years ago for the same reason.
The reply is also tongue-in-cheek, it's just when you pluck these things out of their context and put them as screenshots on a different website in front of people who dont' follow the individuals involved, you end up with goofy takes about it.
Also, not for nothing, the way this was screenshot feels like somebody wanted to dunk on the Female Woman Writer instead of reading it in the spirit it was written.
I kind of agree that it seems like the reply is in on it.
That's reading a lot into the post. Her profile says she's a feminist cartoonist. This is standard virtue signaling. She is such a great feminist, against the patriarchy, she doesn't know a single one. You still know you're father, brother, male coworkers? You're not on her level.