this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
253 points (78.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6325 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

True, but they agree to do it because they need money. It’s like Squid Game but less extreme (I actually never saw squid game so maybe that’s a bad analogy). The system has failed these people (presumably) and he exploits their need for money in order to make himself look good and raise awareness of his brand so he can make more money too. At least I assume that’s OP’s point

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well I don't think any participant in a MrBeast challenge has ever been shot in the head so I'd say it's a pretty bad analogy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Analogy: a comparison of 2 identical events.

Brilliant

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The differences between these two is extreme enough to merit ridicule.

I do not like giveaways because most of them are just tax-write-offs.

However, if someone has money, it is theirs to decide how to use. And if someone else is being helped and not harmed, then it's a good thing.

I do not know of anyone being harmed by MrBeast.

But I do know of people and animals benefitting from his generousness.

Being embarrassed is not the same as physical injury.

Much like participation in MrBeast videos is not the same as participation in Squid Game.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lmao, the effort you spent in responding to this thread is enough to merit ridicule. It's especially sad considering the content you wrote with that effort.