European Graphic Novels+
“BD” refers to Franco-Belgian comics, but let's open things up to include ALL Euro comics and GN's. Euro-style work from around the world is also welcome!
* BD = "Bandes dessinées"
* BDT = Bedetheque
* GN = graphic novel
* LBK = Lambiek
* LC = "Ligne claire"
Please DO: 1) follow good 'netiquette' and 2) the four simple rules of lemm.ee (this instance) when posting and commenting. As for extracts, they're fine, but don't link to pirated downloads.
MODERATION: If you happen to make a mistake upon the above, then please don't worry about it. We'll likely just laugh it off and let you know. OTOH, obvious bad-faith and hostile efforts will not be tolerated here.
For posting tips, including how to handle NSFW and personal content, see the FAQ below.
The designated language here is English, with a traditional bias towards French. When posting foreign-language content, please DO include helpful context for English-speakers.
---> Here's the community F.A.Q, and our resource page <---
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
- #bandes dessinées
- r/bandedessinee
- [email protected]
- Comics on Lemmy
- GN's on Lemmy
- Heathcliff (w/o HC)
- r/noDCnoMarvel
- Moebius_Art
- Moomin Valley
SEARCHES:
# #Tintin #Asterix #LuckyLuke #Spirou #Gaston #CortoMaltese #Thorgal #Sillage(Wake) #Smurfs #Trondheim #Moebius #Jodorowsky
view the rest of the comments
Haha, fair enough. But for one, I can only report on the reprinted stories I read, which were probably on the tamer side.
Another aspect is that "semi-erotic" in actual graphical depiction is really the most extreme I found it, sexually (edit), so I leave it to readers like you to point out the tawdrier conceptual aspects. I did find the lead frequently objectified though, which somehow was worse than the base graphical aspects, if that makes sense.
And as I've already pointed out, I do find there's more to the stories than just the erotic stuff, such as the reader (through Druuna) being led along twisting, dreamlike paths, questioning what's real and what's not. Anyway, I'll link to the WP article above, which pulls no punches from what I can tell.
I hear ya, throughout, though I had no idea that there were other less explicit versions of the (quite) graphic novel in circulation; I only ever saw the over the top, borderline art (were it not for the exquisite inkwork and blocking, that is), to be clear. 😶
Oof, the more I understand what went on in the books, the more I feel like an idiot. So I've made a few more corrections to the article, and added a further analysis in "EDIT2."
Thanks again for setting me on the right course. 😬
Not at all! Don't you worry, you didn't come across as an idiot in any way throughout. Please, continue sharing your opinions here with us all, especially if you're so willing to let them grow with new experiences. That's a sign of wisdom, honestly. Keep it up! 🤌🏼🥳
In honor of your edifying edits, may I offer this from the article you linked in Edit 2: "...which feels like an argument for the platonic ideal of looking at women without talking to them..."
To be utterly clear, the "platonic" ideal, a la Plato, was a power dynamic that is wholly frowned upon if not outright outlawed in today's world: teacher & student. (Depending on the age of the latter; ie. collegiate = shameful) And yet, the modern usage of it has allowed for an incredible amount of slack to be inferred in its deployment, going so far as to essentially describe "deep & abiding love without a sexual component"... Which, IMHO, flies in the face of its very namesake. I mean, FFS, it was named after his proclivity to leverage his status to prey on his young male students. 🤦🏼♂️ Ah, vernacular drift, you blameless cuck.