Asklemmy

43970 readers

638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

307

What is the least SEO-fucked search engine? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What search engine is currently showing the most useful results? What other tricks do we have aside of adding "reddit" or whatever internet community to the results?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not sure where you are, but there's practically no place in the US you get a lunch for that. In flat terms it's quite cheep. It's only expensive relative to free.

And when you think about it, your search service really is your internet. It shapes your whole internet experience. If that's not worth $5/month to make sure it's good and not polluted with ads, I don't know what to tell you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

$5 is fine. 300 seems low. I wonder how many searches I actually do in a month.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I felt similarly about this, but upon reflecting, if the searches actually worked and didn't 'come in groups of 5' due to SEO trash, it probably works out?

Haven't tried it myself yet, but I have been finding myself in increasing frustration with Google and degenerate article sausage factories...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I felt similarly about this, but upon reflecting, if the searches actually worked and didn't 'come in groups of 5' due to SEO trash, it probably works out?

Haven't tried it myself yet, but I have been finding myself in increasing frustration with Google and degenerate article sausage factories...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't sure ethor. My first month (last month), I used just over 180. This month might break 200, I have 5 days left. So I'm good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Problem is, 300 searches is 10 per day. I’ve done 52 today. To cover that I’d be paying $25 per month.

I you could have Spotify and Netflix for that.

If I’d paid their $5 rate and done 52 searches every day they’d have billed me $63 in overage charges.

Their pricing model seems insane to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

((52x30)-1000)0.015 is $8.40 over the $10 plan. You wouldn't need the $25 plan yet.

And 52 is a huge number. I'd bet you could cut that in half easily.