this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
302 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Always love when self agrandized authorities act like idiots. Feels like the box wine wins wine competition article.

I have a friend that does photo competitions. They say winning is more about knowing the judges than anything else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple implements a good amount of post processing into their camera app, not surprised judges were not able to be 100% certain.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, as does every other smartphone manufacturer. This includes certain processing stages that specifically use AI to (hopefully) enhance the perceived image quality.

So if they dislike that, they should ban all smartphone cameras and probably a lot of post production software.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just ban the software. Banning the camera is completely unnecessary just don’t use the oem cam app, use one that shoots in raw or such

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Also, lots of people are paranoid about AI and art AI is specifically designed to not "look like AI." So there's bound to be tons of false positives.