this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
777 points (94.4% liked)

People Twitter

5396 readers
225 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but most of those are boring-ass lunar eclipses. The cool one, the solar eclipse, is much rarer.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even a full solar eclipse happens every 2 years or so.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Total solar eclipses in any given area only happen about once in 300 years I think? (I'm too lazy to go look up the exact math). So unless you are willing to travel the 150 year number isn't that wrong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's more frequent than that. It's a cycle that repeats on a very regular basis.

The current eclipse is part of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Saros_139

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Doesn't that say it changes slightly each year, so if you're on the edge one time you may never see that cycle again and will need to wait until a different full eclipse reaches you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

This was a super cool link. Thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ok, but it is possible to travel.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And it's also entirely possible to travel, paying a premium for accommodations and flights, to an otherwise dull, small town in Texas, and it's cloudy that day, so you've spent thousands of dollars, planning an entire vacation to an uninteresting destination for virtually nothing.

So when one passes by your doorstep, it's worth taking time our of your day to appreciate it, if possible.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In some places, yes. In others, no. My point was that it's an unpredictable risk (and still worthwhile for many people) to travel for an eclipse, and its much more convenient and lower risk to visit when it passes by where you live.

What exactly is your point?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

if you have money and free time, then yes

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Problem is most of them are over water

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, surely people are willing to go to the middle of massive oceans on a boat to see the eclipse :P

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they care enough, they will.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

"It's one banana, Michael. What could it cost? $10?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you have a space ship, you don't even have to wait for them to hit Earth. There's constantly total eclipses from each of the planets and moons. I'm very curious what a total eclipse from a body with an atmosphere would look like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Isn't Earth a body with an atmosphere? Also, I get your point, but boats are a lot more accessible than spacecraft.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I mean where the eclisping body has an atmosphere. The moon is a solid body with hard edges. It can give total eclipses, annular eclipses (where the entire moon is surrounded by the sun but it doesn't block the whole thing because it's farther from the Earth), and partial eclipses (where they overlap but aren't entirely on top of each other).

Earth would make a different kind of shadow where there would be other variations depending on whether the planet itself and/or the atmosphere are fully or partially covering the sun.

And then there's Jupiter, where the atmosphere is much larger than the rocky core and the pressure is high enough that it's not very well defined where the atmosphere transitions from gas to liquid to solid, which would probably give a different effect for eclipses. Though that depends on how opaque or transparent it is, also the sun's apparent size would be smaller, so it might be kinda underwhelming.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago

It's still not really that cool tbh.