this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
268 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
554 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14277930

Kobo announces its first color e-readers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

A PPI of 92, but that screen is going to probably be between 2 and 3 feet from your face, vs the 150 PPI sitting 6 inches to a foot away... Doesn't mean it isn't good enough by any means, but it's certainly not a conclusive comparison

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I have a Boox Ultra C. It has the same screen, I can confidently say the colours are utter shite for any kind of colour sensitive work or media. However, they're more than good enough for conveying information, like different coloured lines on a chart.

The colours also look sharp as fuck, as the grey scale is still used for brightness, and the colour just tints it. Meaning it looks a lot sharper than 150ppi and almost indistinguishable from 300ppi

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How is your boox, BTW? Would you recommend them?

I'm in the market and they look interesting to me but the price is a bit of a shocker

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I would get a Galaxy Tab if the E-Ink isn't vital for you. But otherwise it's a very capable E-Int tablet, and it running Android means you can do anything on it you can an Android tablet.

The real killer is the latency though, for most things it's pretty bad, except in Boox's own apps where it's so damn quick it feels like writing on paper.

I wouldn't recommend it unless you know it's exactly what you're looking for, but if it is what you want then it's easily best in class

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

6 inches? I think you need glasses ...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, 6 inches is about the furthest something can be for me to see it with any clarity at all without glasses, regardless of size and resolution, but still often read without them on my phone just to relax my eyes (and also, nothing looks clearer to me than something a few inches from my face with my glasses off)

But i did say "6 inches to a foot" which I'm at least assuming is not that atypical a range that people hold their devices at, but I'm not that great at judging distance overall... At the very least, my point is you're holding the small device much closer than the bigger screen will be so needs higher PPI to still look as crisp

[–] Vlyn 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Of course, but it's mostly for reading. The color will probably be used for notes and the occasional image, for which it's easily good enough. When I read it's usually a foot away, while I keep my monitor at 2 feet.

Black and white content (text) has 300 dpi atleast, so for that it's perfect.

E-Ink is fantastic for lots of reading and battery life, for everything else an actual screen is leagues ahead. The response time is awful too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Fully agree, just an observation about the comparison