this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
333 points (84.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21393 readers
2076 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I use Windows btw

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Ubuntu ain't what it used to be. If you want a simple distro nowadays just go straight to the source with Debian. There's no real benefit to going with Ubuntu anymore, and community distros are just a safer bet. Corporate distros aren't your friend.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

    I'm very happy with debian. So many applications ship a .deb, and you don't have to deal with the Canonical bullshit.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yea it sorta just works and has a lot of community support. Imo the easiest of the distros which is not a bad thing. Turn off snaps and it basically is golden. Never needed backups in like 10 years because I know how to fix everything. The only thing that fucks up at this point is Nvidia but same thing has happened to me on Fedora.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    You're mid-curve now. Ubuntu's better than ever.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

    Distros based on Ubuntu are better than ever. Ubuntu isn't the move tho

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Oh yeah, Debian is such a poser distro that people only use to sound smart. I brag about how I managed to pull off a full Debian installation all the time. Memes can never, ever under any circumstances end up out of date or anything.

    Edit in response to your edit: Canonical has been neglecting the desktop version of Ubuntu for years now. They've pulled in some improvements from other distros, so technically it is better, but the only thing they've contributed to themselves are snaps, and even that's just hand-me-downs from server and IoT. The rest of the desktop Linux world has moved on. The things Ubuntu did better than anyone else ten years ago just aren't special anymore. You can like what you like, but Ubuntu is no longer the undisputed king of straightforward, user-friendly, and low maintenance.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    BTW keep in mind this is [email protected] and there's a certain lightness in the robustness of arguments that goes with it. So on a more serious note, you speak of Ubuntu as having no real benefit over Debian. While I love Debian, using the Ubuntu version of Debian, I get 10 years of security support for free (for up to 5 machines). This is objectively a real benefit for anyone that doesn't plan to upgrade every two years compared to Debian. You're right in principle about corporate distros not being your friend, however Canonical isn't an IBM-owned, publicly traded corporation. Yet.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It may be shocking to you, but I'm actually aware that this isn't all super serious, and I'm also being light with the robustness of my arguments. Who knew, right? That being said, Debian releases are supported for five years, not two. Ubuntu also releases a new LTS version every two years. I suppose if for some reason you thought it was still a good idea to be on Ubuntu 14.04 that'd technically be a benefit, but the implication of this thread seems to be that we're talking about desktop distros. That's certainly what I've been talking about. If you're seriously still running Ubuntu 14.04 on your home computer you're way more of a niche contrarian edge case than Arch users.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    So does debian not have like 4 years old packages anymore in stable or do I have to live in bleeding edge unstable?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

    There was just a new release, so nothing that old for now, but by the time the next release comes around this one will be getting long in the tooth, no doubt. Debian isn't for everyone, but if you need the latest version as a native app then you're not any better off with Ubuntu at this point. Debian is stable and secure and you can use flatpaks, appimages, or even snaps if you're feeling nasty to get any apps that you really need to be up to date. That's not what everyone wants, but for those people I'd recommend something like Arch, Fedora, or OpenSUSE, not Ubuntu. Ubuntu has just been neglecting the desktop for a while now, and it shows. They were the best once. Now everyone has passed them.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

    Debian and Ubuntu LTS are both ~2 year cycles, but Debian has traditionally been better than Ubuntu at picking up security fixes

    If you sign up for Ubuntu Pro, they might be as good as Debian, now, but I haven’t checked

    If you want faster than that, something other than Debian makes sense

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    There's also "testing" in between. It's not as stable as - well - "stable", but I didn't have trouble with it.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    Im fighting with you brother

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    What about with a laptop where you can't disable secure boot? Ubuntu works with it ootb, very few other distros do.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    I don't actually think there is literally no scenario where Ubuntu makes sense, especially if someone else is limiting your options. For the record though, I think Fedora has gotten to be a better Ubuntu then Ubuntu, and it works with secure boot out of the box.