this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
165 points (71.4% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
5543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What the hell. Guys read the fucking article. I mean both articles, there is another one linked into the main one. The inner article is bullshit, the author misunderstood a website. That makes the outer article bullshit too! How can people upvote such low quality posts???

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An article by Alex Ivanovs of Stack Diary brought the allegations against Brave to light.

Then why the fuck are we reading this shit article and not reading the other one? I hate modern "journalism".

Also, from the original, non-ripped-off article (links retained):

And don't get me wrong, I love Brave, and I've given them credit where it's due; it's also my understanding that the Brave Search API feature is new as a whole (released in May 2023), so perhaps it wasn't or hasn't been thought through completely.

So, whatever fear-mongering this SEJ shit article was trying to cultivate is completely absent in the original article.