this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
840 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

10923 readers
1794 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
840
Can I lick it? (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It would be more likely a secondary or tertiary effect. That is, H• radicals ripped away from their parent molecules would leave •OH, •R, and •RNH radicals. These are unstable and highly reactive, "desiring" to have that stable electron configuration. Likely, this will result in electrons being shifted to bring in more stable species, like OH-. Overall, we're looking at effectively a deprotonation of the saliva, with extra intermediary steps to stabilize the radicals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Given that H• is a neutral species, what would cause the preference for the creation of stable negative species (freeing up H+) over the creation of stable positive species (freeing up OH-)?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neutral as far as pH is concerned, yes. However, radicals tend to be very reactive due to their valance not being full. I am a bit rusty, TBH, as I'm about a decade and a half out of uni but, the best way to predict the products of the reaction is to look at the high-level of the equation:

H• (excess) + H••OH + H••R + H••N-R -> H2(g) + •OH + •R + •N-R

All of the products of the initial reaction here are radicals except for the H2 molecules. They all are going to further react to form more stable species with full valances, with possible exception being the molecular hydrogen. Because the elemental hydrogen is introduced as a radical rather than protons (H+ ions) in the solution, the final products are likely to be more negatively charged, neutral, and/or have some interesting hydrogen additions, especially in the hydrocarbons and amino acids.

For example, there could be reactions like: R• + •OH + •N-R -> R-OH + HO-N-R

Overall, however, the amount of free hydrogen/protons is likely to be reduced as they are effectively removed from solution as hydrogen gas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because the elemental hydrogen is introduced as a radical rather than protons (H+ ions) in the solution, the final products are likely to be more negatively charged

This is the part I don't understand. If charge is conserved, why would there be a preference for a particular charge in the products?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. I think that you're absolutely correct. The products should have charge conserved. After initial attack of hydrocarbons by H• radicals, H2 is likely to be a significant product. Supposing STP, it would likely remove itself from solution, leaving the fresh radicals to chain react and probably making interesting and unhealthy things.

My apologies, I'm out of the lab and field 15 years now so, do make some pretty basic mistakes at times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

After initial attack of hydrocarbons by H• radicals, H2 is likely to be a significant product. Supposing STP, it would likely remove itself from solution, leaving the fresh radicals to chain react and probably making interesting and unhealthy things.

That makes sense.

My apologies, I’m out of the lab and field 15 years now so, do make some pretty basic mistakes at times.

No worries! I've enjoyed this discussion!