this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
11 points (82.4% liked)
Movies and TV Shows
2088 readers
71 users here now
A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.
Rules:
- Be civil.
- Please do not link to pirated content.
- No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
- Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He is a bad guy but the law is the law. We need it to be applied fairly.
It just means there will be a new trial and then he’ll be back in prison.
A court case should be a finding of truth about what happened, it should not be a referendum on somebody's popularity. I totally agree with you, they will try the case again, they will make their finding of fact. And we will all move on with our lives
I find it interesting the vote was four to three, and the dissenting opinion was focused on political precedent rather than the rule of law. This tells me this case was more about popularity and political issues than the actual matter in front of the court. That is a very dangerous precedent
It should be all about the law. Weinstein is a bad man and should be in prison but the law has to be followed. If our system isn’t fair and run properly, it isn’t a real legal system.