68
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Interesting to hear such things discussed at that level. Turning it off is suggested to get rid of compromised background processes that might be spying on users. Obviously, this only help against malware that isn't permanently installed on a phone.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

As if any spyware worth it's salt didn't install itself as service with an innocuous name. Something like "Facebook" or "TikTok".

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

undefined> Something like “Facebook” or “TikTok”.

I wouldn't call those innocuous at all, lol.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I have both of those spywares installed!!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That was my initial reaction too, but I believe there is also a good amount of attacks that use 0-day exploits and might not have an angle for permanence yet.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

This is good advice if your phone is actively being hacked in real time when you turn it off. Otherwise all you're doing is delaying or temporarily interrupting any data collection that's going on in the background. Any apps that are sophisticated enough to run undetected by a normal user are also going to restart themselves as soon as the phone boots up again.

Also, if you are being targeted by a hacker that is knowledgeable enough to actively get into your device (especially an iPhone) without physical access then you're better off destroying it and buying a new one, along with doing a full reset of all of your passwords, 2FA setup, and anything else you think you're relying on for "security".

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That is not true. Many attacks (e.g. the recently revealed Operation Triangulation) do not have persistence.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yup, a lot of very sophisticated mobile malware does not have persistence. His advice holds up.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

you’re better off destroying it and buying a new one

Um, what? Spending a thousand bucks on a new phone, which they will probably infect almost immediately, is poor advice.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Something this might accidentally do is apply an update which would indeed be a boon to security.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, the pegasus spyware, yes the NSO group one, will be removed by this. This is to avoid leaving evidence of an infection on the phone. (the phone can be reinfected in seconds of course)

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But without my phone how will I know when 5 minutes have passed?
/s

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

These days, I don't think phones even turn off completely. Closing to sleeping. And only a portion of background services will stop and restart.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Try holding your power button for a bit of time or letting your battery run down. Phones absolutely turn off

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What I’m saying is - even though it says “shut down”, it’s not doing a real shut down. Yes, you could fully let the battery run dry. But that takes 12 hours and you can’t do it once a day. Plus it ruins your battery’s capacity.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn't seem like a hibernate though - it always has to reload the homescreen and doesn't remember processes from before the reboot and sk on.

What are you saying it does instead, if it's not a real shut down? What is it about it that makes it not a real shutdown? As compared to a computer shutdown.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think this might be true for iOS, isn't the case on Android.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Well I guess mobile phone marketing can use this an reason for poor battery life. It's now a security feature to force users to reboot every 12 hours.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Does setting your phone to limit background processes to 4 (vs the standard limit) in developer settings potentially have a similar effect? If it periodically kills the nefarious process so it can run something else as you usd your phone?

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37361 readers
234 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS