55
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

By the close of Washington’s legislative session last week, state lawmakers had added more funding to help reduce health care insurance costs for undocumented immigrants, as the state also prepares to expand Apple Health, its free or low-cost health insurance, to the same population in July.

This year, the Legislature added $28.4 million, nearly twice as much as its first allocation of such funding during the 2023 session, to continue helping the 16,000 individuals who applied for coverage during the recent enrollment period, which ended Jan. 15.

In May 2022, Washington was the first state to file a waiver application to allow undocumented immigrants to buy private health insurance; a year later, the waiver was approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of the Treasury.

The waiver meant undocumented immigrants could apply for Medicaid or shop for private health care insurance through Healthplanfinder, the website to apply for health care in Washington.

Mixed-status families, or families with different citizenship or immigration statuses, can also purchase private insurance coverage together.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

I can see the reasoning for this. They are tax payers (most of the state budget comes from sales tax and even aside from that, most undocumented immigrants pay income tax) and as long as they are residents, I don't see why they would not qualify. I also know that can certainly stress budgets. Unfortunately our immigration system means that many of these immigrants have no legal path to be here let alone getting citizenship. So I guess if you are against this, bitch to your representative with your dollars to get a non shitty immigration system.

And on the politics of immigration, I've found that most people are in agreement on the process. When you ask people who rant on and on about illegal immigrants what they think the immigration process should be, they largely want a similar process to people who would consider themselves more pro immigration. I recently talked about immigration with a relative recently and mentioned how their was essentially no process when our ancestors came over. She countered by mentioning that my great grandmother went through Ellis Island and eventually had to take a citizenship test. Many conflate immigration with citizenship which is a bit silly. I know several people who immigrated as children and only decided to spend the tens of thousands of dollars to go through citizenship after having lived here for a few decades. Have a conversation with a person who is against illegal immigration and ask how the process should be instead of throwing out talking points. You'll find that many of them actually agree with you.

[-] Itsamelemmy 3 points 4 months ago

I don't have a problem with immigrants having health care. I do have an issue with working full time, paying almost $500 a month for insurance (spouse and myself) that's honestly crap.

I was on obamacare when I had to have 2 discs in my neck replaced. Didn't cost me a cent. That's what I want for every citizen in this country.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Same. Currently on Apple Health and it is such a stress reliever to not have to worry about how much a service will cost because the clinic sent a sample to be tested over to someone who is not in network or going to the ER of a hospital that is in network only to find out the ER is a separate entity that is not in network.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

News

21860 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS