this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
327 points (96.8% liked)

Work Reform

9798 readers
422 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A company that achieved success due to people having to WFH are now forcing staff back in to the office

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Somebody should tell them about that software you can use for video teleconferences in case that opens up options for remote work. Can't remember what it's called though.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah they clearly use Cisco Webex.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I used to work for Cisco and even we avoided using that most of the time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

AOL Messenger.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one that is going to use all the data for AI training? They are not that stupid. ;-)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, I'm certain they have a way to, like, exclude internal conversations from that. They'd be foolish not to have a system to disable collection on some accounts/calls

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They rolled out encryption a while back, they wouldn't have access to fully encrypted ones anyways

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No, those types of apps are obviously not useful for remote work, or else they would use one. Back to work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Google meet?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's just bad PR. I can't imagine the potential profits are worth the risk.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s been proven over and over remote work retains top talent and makes people better at their work. And the “productivity loss” is covered by the fact that people maybe get less done in eight hours, but work longer to make up for the productivity they lost to taking more breaks.

But American capitalism has to remind the workers that their misery is part of the point.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure there is any productivity loss, I work way more efficiently at home

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Same. Guy that sits behind me in the office has an average speaking volume of 78 decibels. Yes, I pulled out a sound meter one day because he is so goddamn loud. And I'm stuck in an open floor plan with him.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you had kids, pets, etc, you might find yourself taking more breaks. But breaks are probably good for productivity too...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A quiet desk with your dog next to you or... soul-crushing commute and a noisy office?

Gee, I wonder why people are generally more productive at home?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Especially with the expansion of the open office.. Ugh. I've avoided it for most of my career and I hope to never go back to an official office unless it has a door on it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus there's a multitude of studies showing that people work far less than 8 hours a day, even if they are physically present at the job. I doubt productivity actually drops at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I worked in a government office that supported a very seasonal industry.
My coworker had an 8:30 start and would be done her work by 9.
Other times we wouldn't have time in the day to finish, but the slow season was hell.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The productivity loss takes place at the office. You go from being able to solve problems all day to having Susie Homemaker and Joe Blob wanting to talk to you about the sportsball event when you're in the middle of super complicated logic. You go from being able to use the restroom 30 seconds from your desk to walking 10 minutes to get to the closest one at the office. You go from making a quick sandwich and then getting back to work, to driving miles away to find something decent to eat. Every engineer I know is more productive at home.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More likely, they've reached critical mass and are now using this as a downsizing move. They know a % will quit. Will reduce the number they have to float until eventual layoffs.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aren't they risking losing their most talented workers doing that? I assume they can more easily find jobs providing the flexibility they're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I work in tech, at one of the big tech companies (the Rainforest one).

The dirty little secret of tech is that you don't need the best engineers. You just need people that are "good enough", and that bar varies wildly across all of tech. I've worked with senior engineers from Google that absolutely crumbled outside of building Python web apps, and recent grads in LCOL areas that are better in all areas.

Alongside this, many tier 1 services in big tech are propped up by mid-level engineers. Depending on the company and org, you'd be shocked at how little coding some software engineers actually do, because they're attending WBR's, building review decks, running all scrum ceremonies, even responsible for multimillion dollar team budgets. Again, many of these people aren't particularly talented compared to your standard engineer.

You're absolutely right, but I doubt any big tech company cares. They want to reduce human cost as much as possible, and if that means letting everyone that knows how shit works go, and hiring new grads to keep your systems alive, so be it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Thing is, us "good enough" engineers want to wfh too, and we're willing to walk because of it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's very shortsighted though. One great engineer is worth 10 mediocre engineers, especially when you factor in the time required to manage them. But I've never built a trillion dollar company before, so I'm probably not qualified to say that my ideas are better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Guess who gets exceptions to the policy?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is their software so bad that they can't even use it for its intended purpose?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally really don't like zoom. Apparently still useful for mass layoff calls

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a company meeting yesterday, by any chance?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Why was it even popular in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is on top of the changes to their Terms of Service that enables them to use anything on your calls to train their AI and scrap any customer data.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I know a lot of therapists and doctors that use Zoom...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

This is so deliciously hypocritical.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where is Zoom even HQed? These articles are shitty.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Quick search says San Jose, California.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is just epic shortsightedness.