873
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 89 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You really can’t use the bible against christians, unfortunately. With the millions of translations it went through, it is damn near illegible.

This passage is probably one of the worst, too.

They will just respond with “tHaTS NOt wHaT iT MeANs”, and you can’t really argue with that because it’s so poorly written.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago

Meh, the Jews have done plenty of analysis. It's their text after all. They've established personhood status is achieved at birth. Abortion while not promoted, isn't considered 'illegal' IIRC.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Of course you can. Just respond to them "who are you to make claims what god meant". Because if it's word of god, it's word of god and not up to you to interpret it whatever you like or pick and chose in what you believe. But most importantly, Bible says woman is not to lecture a man, but she is to remain silent and obedient. That sort of kills half of the arguments right there.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Even scholarly attempt to analyze the "support abortion" claim fails to do so: https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/29/1/11/7103199

Edit: religion dumb

[-] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

That article is kind of weak and is clearly written by someone seeking a conclusion from the outset. They're trying to claim that numbers was mistranslated and actually means that if a wife had an affair, you should rush to your priest and they will make a cup of dirty water, force her to drink it and make her pray. What is the purpose of this weird task? Clearly to give her a stomach ache and make her feel bad. The story as a whole makes no sense in that context and completely pointless.

You can't claim something is mistranslated if the alternative translation makes no sense and the main translation does. In this case, I think the author really wants to dodge the correct interpretation of the passage.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

it's also wildly unsourced, as if this person is a primary source for speaking ancient hebrew

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

For those that won't read but want context.

  • The author is a medical professional and researcher, and also speaker for The Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics (rationale arguments for Christianity)
  • Commentor's "even" statement above speculates the author is biased against, this is not true.
  • As with anything, bias can not be ruled out with the above

The meme is referencing:

If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen (bitnah, בטנה) will swell (root tsabah, צבה) and her womb (yerekah, ירכה) will miscarry (root naphal, נפל), and she will become a curse. (Numbers 5:27, NIV)

When he has made her drink the water, then, if she has defiled herself and has been unfaithful to her husband, the water that brings the curse shall enter into her and cause bitter pain, and her womb (bitnah, בטנה) shall discharge (root tsabah, צבה), her uterus (yerekah, ירכה) drop (root naphal, נפל), and the woman shall become an execration among her people. (Numbers 5:27, NRSV)

The authors argument is that NIT mistranslates, and this is not a drug for miscarriage (uterus, miscarry), but a laxative (bowels).

The argument seems sound, however as admitted, nothing can be determined for sure.

I have not looked at any counterpoints, this is just my interpretation of the study.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

he's a medical professional, but his argument relies entirely on his own linguistic aptitude?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

The problem when you bash millions of people is that your claims against the group becomes untrue very quickly. The Christians in my neck of the woods are generally supportive of women who want to get abortions. Maybe you believe that caveat is automatically implied, but I didn't catch that from my reading of your comment.

I'm not saying there aren't too many who oppose abortion on religious grounds, but I think the bigger problem in society right now is people who have generalized opinions about people due to some (usually intrinsic) group they belong to.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Please consider my reply in context of the post, it is not a standalone piece. It’s clear who “christians” refers to in this context.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

The problem when you bash millions of people is that your claims against the group becomes untrue very quickly. The Christians in my neck of the woods are generally supportive of women who want to get abortions.

That's true.

Even in Italy, house of the Vatican, home of the Pope, with 60% of Italians being Catholic Christians, abortion is perfectly legal since 1978 and no one even thinks about making it illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 57 points 3 months ago

Not quite, but in context, this appears to be true:

16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[d] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

[-] [email protected] 63 points 3 months ago

Things ancient Israeli priests cared about:

  • The sanctity of life before and after birth: ❌

  • Making sure that women were subservient to the men they had been married or given to: ✅

[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

…ancient?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

100%, their god isn't even pro choice. He's full on pro-abortion.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago

Heck, he ain't even against 4th term - A few passages mention dashing baby skulls against rocks

Cloud dude really hates babies

[-] Technus 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I always say I support abortion up to 216 months post term. The little bastard continues to be treated as a parasite until it can fend for itself.

Fun fact, I learned that 216 = 6x6x6 from a Christian YA novel. Three guesses which one and the first two don't count.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

The only one I can recall is the chronicles of narnia?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

Oh how many of them would abandon the faith if they had actually read the damned book and realized how lefty Jesus comes across as, although it's worth reminding that he would technically be classified as an absolute monarchist by present definitions, seeing his emergence coinciding with the backlash against Rome just blowing the Judean throne up in favor of riling the place directly after the jews kept getting "unruly"

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Reading and studying the bible (and not listening to apologists), is how atheists are made.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Not always, sometimes it results in oddballs who end up founding a new denomination or being the figure of admiration when some grifter founds a denomination in their supposed image.

Really the sheer number of protestant denominations should be held up in literature classes to teach just how many interpretations to a single text can be determined just from how different people read the same passages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In part II of this segment from Samantha bee, she talks about how Christians used to be opposed to politics because it was seen as “ungodly” and “dirty” to get involved in. [Relevant part is about 1:15 into the video, but you should watch the whole thing, as well as part I. She did some great investigative stuff, but she was a woman in late night, which was basically bound to fail.]

Well, until bussing/segregation spurred that white Christian bloc into action, that is. And when the fervor of that issue died down, the right wing pricks literally got on a conference call to try to reactivate those people to win elections. They were spitballing which issues they could use to get them involved again, and literally one of those assholes just said, “how about abortion?”

And voila. The religious right was born in earnest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

I was hoping this was going to be a lot of fun to read, but the entire story has little or nothing to do with abortion. And while I suppose if you want to interpret it like that, you could, but that’s a bit hypocritical.

It is, however, I really good example of how the Bible says it’s OK to torture women

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

It has everything to do with an abortion. How else do you think the husband would think the wife had an affair other than she is pregnant and shouldn't be?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

You expected any talk about abortion to be fun? Whether an abortion is no one’s business but the woman’s, I can’t imagine fun could come anywhere near the experience.

Also, the whole section (not just 21) is a step-by-step guide which results in aborting a baby conceived in an extramarital relationship.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Didn't knew water mixed with random dirt caused abortions

It is a marvelous way to get diarrhea tho

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Heyo, I’m thinking you may not be a native English speaker? Your sentence was nearly perfect, but you got the wording a little wrong, which is what made me think that may be the case.

For reference, it’s either “didn’t know” or “never knew” with the latter being a longer amount of time. “I didn’t know I dropped that dollar bill” vs “I never knew Santa was an alien.”

Just wanted to hop on and let you know in hopes of helping you improve. ^_^

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Bruh. Dollars to doughnuts, that was just a typo/auto-wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Yep. There's another passage where god goes through an area and performs abortions

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

And performs 34th trimester abortions on some kids making fun of a bald dude.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

And one where he performs a bunch of 4th-89th trimester abortions if they happened to be the first born—if there wasn’t lambs blood over the door!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Can someone with a Bible confirm? Sounds like some funny hoax to me.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

You are someone with a Bible since there's free ones online.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Oh... right! I didn't think of that. :)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The Test for an Unfaithful Wife

11 Then the Lord said to Moses, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him 13 so that another man has sexual relations with her, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14 and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15 then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephah[c] of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy, a reminder-offering to draw attention to wrongdoing.

16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[d] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

“‘Then the woman is to say, “Amen. So be it.”

23 “‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24 He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25 The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26 The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial[e] offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27 If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

it's pointless to use their own texts against them. they don't care what it says. they have their own agenda, and using their own scripture only legitimizes it. there is only one way to deal with these people...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
873 points (98.2% liked)

Atheist Memes

5227 readers
812 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS