this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
324 points (98.8% liked)

News

23310 readers
3548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sent to jail Friday to await trial after a bail hearing for the fallen cryptocurrency wiz left a judge convinced that he had repeatedly tried to influence witnesses against him.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He is the nicest billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there was an electric chair he would be Fried Bankman-Fried

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

he's certainly never going to be Freed Bankman-Fried

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are his parents going to lose their house now?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. Bail is collateral if a person fails to appear. Bail term revocation and bail bond forfeiture are entirely different things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The New York government [pdf warning] says [emphasis added]:

While the case is open, the defendant must obey all court orders and attend all
scheduled court appearances. If not, the court may revoke bail, which means the
bond is forfeited and you lose your collateral.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He wasn’t charged by NY state. The southern district of NY(SDNY) is a federal court. In federal court:

When a defendant's bail is revoked for failing to appear or violating a bail condition, any money put up for bond can be forfeited.

Though they can both happen for the same reasons, they are separate things, and one doesn’t happen automatically because of the other.

In this case:

His bail was revoked. His bail was not forfeited.

I don’t think in any state bail revocation makes bail forfeiture automatic. They’re separate actions.

The court would make two separate rulings:

The defendants bail terms are revoked.

The defendant’s bail shall be forfeited.

And the headline would read Bankman bail revoked and forfeited

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the clarification: I appreciate it, and I leave a more knowledgeable person than I was before!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good natured discussion is contagious. Thank you for being so chill.

I should have mentioned this too::

To be fair, this statement I made incorrect in a way:

No. Bail is collateral if a person fails to appear.

It’s loosely (or more so) implies something that is somewhat incorrect. In a way, implies that bail is only for collateral. And that’s not true either. As you mentioned. The fact that bail can be forfeited for numerous things all lends a secondary purpose of insuring that not only they appear, but also comply with other terms of their bail.

I didn’t mean to imply that was it’s only purpose. I meant to imply it was the primarily purpose, but most importantly I meant to make a distinction between revocation and forfeiture.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finally. Took long enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If there"s one thing I love but am perpetually frustrated by, it's how slow the US legal system is. Yes, "finally." OTOH, citizens have rights and one of them is innocence until guilt is judged, and also that we try really hard to not let the general public, under the influence of the 5th Estate, be that judge. It's super frustrating when it's obvious to me that the person is guilty. It can also be extremely unbalanced, with people whe can afford better council getting better benefits-of-a-doubt than the poor. But in general, we have a pretty good system which - if I were ever caught in - has protections I'd be grateful for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I meant finally in that it’s been pretty obvious that he’s been engaging in witness tampering, and they’re finally throwing it at him on that alone. I understand the initial house arrest terms and such as reasonable as long as he didn’t do anything obviously illegal before trial, but it took too long for them to call him on these tampering charges. His FAFO should have happened sooner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For what it's worth, a lot of times the reason why these trials take so long is because they are trying to build an airtight case. Kind of the same reason why sometimes you see obvious murderers being treated "well" like that shitstain kid who shot up a school a few years back. They want to make sure there's no bias, no mistreatment, no cause for mistrial etc. It's frustrating but I guess I get it.

Disclaimer, I'm not a lawyer

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Good. Scum like him deserve to rot behind bars.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Five new felony charges too! You love to see it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

He should have been in jail the whole time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

HOW LONG HOW LONG