this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
492 points (98.6% liked)

News

22839 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Governor Ron DeSantis’s challenging of a ‘continuous eligibility’ rule has booted over 22,000 children off insurance since January

Florida is continuing to “callously” strip healthcare coverage from thousands of children in lower-income households in defiance of a new federal law intended to protect them.

Since 1 January, more than 22,500 children have been disenrolled from Florida KidCare, its version of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (Chip) that is jointly subsidized by states and the US government for families with earnings just above the threshold for Medicaid.

Florida healthcare officials admit at least some were removed for non-payment of premiums, an action prohibited by the “continuous eligibility” clause of the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act that took effect at the beginning of this year. The clause secures 12 months of cover if at least one premium payment is made.

Last week, the administration of Republican governor Ron DeSantis challenged the rule in federal court Tampa, arguing it makes Chip an entitlement program that illegally overrides a state law requiring monthly payment of premiums.

But it has chosen not to wait for a ruling before continuing to separate children from coverageFigures from the Florida Health Justice Project show there were 5,552 removals in the month to 1 April, following 5,097 in March, 5,147 in February, and 6,780 in January.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The #GOP are monsters.

If you vote #GOP, you're a monster too.

Prediction: Florida will get sued in Federal Court & lose, again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Depends on if they draw a trump judge or not

[–] [email protected] 85 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ron Desantis is trying to kill your children!

Don't get why his opponents aren't running ads like that continuously.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Make sure they are born, so they can die to the system like normal people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

mulching is a key step in the process of producing soylent green.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Children without health insurance rarely have the spare coin necessary to run political ads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

That's not who would run them ..?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Liberals are over reacting AGAIN! This isn't callous. These are redundant programs. The children of Florida already get insurance through their employers. In fact Swamp Harvesters LLC has the most comprehensive children's insurance for maiming by an alligator in the country people!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago

not gonna lie, I thought you were legitimately posting until like the last third of your post.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The pro-life party at it again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I'm old enough to remember conservatives crowing about how "All Lives Matter".

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I can’t wait to piss on this assholes grave someday

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

I’ll shit on it, you piss on it.

And Trump’s too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I would, but doing so would involve visiting Florida.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This man just lives to be cruel. Given any opportunity to do something cruel, he takes it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Must be some kind of bully complex. He desperately wants to be seen as strong, but only ever comes across as cruel. As much as I love a good chuckle on Florida Mans, I feel for them that lil’ Ronda is still in power.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Definitely a bully. Going all the way back to the "thigh food" story where he would mispronounce the word on a date and then dump the woman if she told him he was mispronouncing it back in college. And I'm sure way back before that. I'd love someone to dig up some of the kids that I'm sure he bullied in grade school.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’d love someone to dig up some of the kids that I’m sure he bullied in grade school.

I bet his 5'2" ass was the one getting bullied.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Maybe he was the short kid who stood next to the bully and laughed at everything he did.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As a mod of the sub, I can't ethically support this path of discussion and advise that you tread carefully as to not run afoul of various possible interpretations of Rule 1.

As a Floridian, I upvoted that shit before I walked in the room.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It should be fine...it's clearly not a realistic depiction. No normal person could reasonably be expected to believe that a stick man that tall is Ron DeSantis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fuckin gottem. Although I regret not trying to draw the boots. Maybe in a future iteration

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Thank you for your service o7

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

what should I do?

Add a furnace behind the wood chipper

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I cannot give you advice in this situation, but I do know you'll do the right thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I promise to live up to the faith you've put in me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I always believed in you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Fertilize the tree of freedom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Shoot him in the gut. Wood chipper would be too quick for him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

What if the wood chipper has a pulse button like on a blender?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Make sure it's on.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unsurprising. Bans gender-affirming care but he wears heels to help him feel more masculine. Only thing he hasn't done is wear a cowboy hat (that's I've seen).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why a cowboy hat? Has he banned those too?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

He watched Porky's and decided the titular character should be emulated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Nah, just it's the quintessential conservative costume piece when they're desperate for votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

*intentionally

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ron DeSantis, American cock holster for fascists.

Have fun losing in court again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Forgive my potential lack of understanding, but when a federal law and a state law clash, isn't the federal law the winner? So if the state law requires monthly payment of premiums, but federal law requires 12 months of coverage from a single premium, Florida is supposed to be SOL?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Normally, yes.

With this supreme court? Who knows.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Yes. This is performative except for all of the children he's hurting.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

For the most part, federal law will override state law. However, states have broader powers in the kinds of laws they can make, while the federal government is more limited. That's part of why the commerce clause comes up so much, it's frequently used to justify federal authority in things that would normally be handled at the state level, even if it means stretching the definition of commerce from time to time.

In this case, I'm guessing that this challenge is based on this being a program administered by the state, and partially funded by the federal government. Programs like that generally come with federal requirements that the state has to follow in order to get the funding. The federal government can exert significant influence over state policy this way, (for example, the drinking age went from 18 to 21 largely because states that didn't make the change would have lost federal funds for highways). But there have been cases where the requirements were thrown out for being too coercive and undermining constitutional authority delegated to the states.

Of course, I highly doubt that such a claim would have any merit in this case. But meritless lawsuits aren't a problem when they stir up support from your base while having no negative consequences for you if you lose. Sure, it costs the state a lot of money, but when the state's lawyers are your buddies, that's just doing them a favor.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Someone federal should "callously" charge him for mass child endangerment and "choose not to wait for a ruling" before throwing his ass in a jail cell

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Desantis seems to have gotten some santorum on him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Lol maybe more ways then 1?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

that downvote brought to you by another person who didn't think RATM was talking about politics

load more comments
view more: next ›