22
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

Bullshit.

EAs are not lying about being interested in longtermism or x-risk mitigation, they're just not dumping that info on newcomers. They aren't pretending to help the global poor and sick for PR, they are actually helping the poor and sick and hoping it gives them leverage and legitimacy for their x-risk mitigation.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Yes, they’re helping the sick and poor only so far as it increases their leverage and legitimacy to funnel money to issues that are not helping the sick and poor.

In other words, a bait and switch.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

We shouldn't be looking to business to help the poor in the first place. That should be the government's job.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Exactly, if you got money to spare for AI shit you have enough to pay taxes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It is everybody's job to help the poor

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Sure, mainly by paying their fair share of taxes so the government can have a robust social safety net.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

No, they are helping the sick and poor, full stop.

They aren't lying about their interest in AGI and they aren't collecting money under false pretenses and then spending it to slow AGI development somehow.

That's not a bait and switch, it's an organization with multiple areas of interest.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

If you believe that, I have a castle to sell you!

Two, actually, at last count.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Skeptic

1207 readers
1 users here now

A community for taking a critical look at pseudoscience, quackery, and boldfaced BS.

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." ~ David Hume

Things we like:

• Thoughtful discussion
• Humor
• Civility

Things we don't like quite so much:

• Trolling
• Low-effort comments and posts
• Personal attacks
• Spam
• URL shorteners

Carl Sagan's Nine Precepts of Skeptical Thinking:

  1. Confirm the reality (independent of the status quo).
  2. Encourage debate on the evidence by proponents of all points of view.
  3. Avoid appeals to authority.
  4. Recognize that there is always more than one hypothesis.
  5. Do not cling to a hypothesis simply because it is yours.
  6. Attaching a numerical quantity is key to discriminating hypotheses.
  7. In a chain of argument, all the links must work—not just most of them.
  8. Everything else being equal, the simplest explanation is the most likely.
  9. Proposals that cannot be proven or shown to be false do not have much scientific value.

Suggested Fediverse Communities

RFK Jr. Watch @lemm.ee - Tackling misinformation being spread by antivaxxer politician, Robert F Kennedy Jr.
DebunkThis @lemmy.world - an evidence-based community for debunking misinformation and dubious claims.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS