this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
11 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

1163 readers
333 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple's grudging accommodation of European antitrust rules by allowing third-party app stores on iPhones has left users of its Safari browser exposed to potential web activity tracking.

Developers Talal Haj Bakry and Tommy Mysk looked into the way Apple implemented the installation process for third-party software marketplaces on iOS with Safari, and concluded Cupertino's approach is particularly shoddy.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Does it even use secure DNS by default? No? Then it cannot be much more secure than any other browser, and their integrated Apple IDs make their users more identifiable, so... A lie even before this app store mess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

App Stores need to track the user to determine if the user has installed the website app before.

The EU demanded Apple allow third party stores and if Apple didn't implement these with the same feature set available to Apples store, the complaints would be focused there instead.

There are people who like to pick on Apple and most of them are technologically illiterates. This was true long before Apple become insanely profitable with the iPhone. It will continue to be true for the foreseeable future.

Haters need to hate. Apple haters are a distinct fetish.

[–] BrikoX 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Apple claims to invest billions upon billions in R&D and you say they can't develop a private way to ping the users. But the reality is that it's just intentional failings on Apple part, so that they can continue to falsely claim regulations hurt privacy and security. If you read the full article and not just the headline, you would know that Apple doesn't even bother to check the site origin or validate JWTs. That is not a mistake someone with years of experience would make, it's intentional moves to make it less secure.

[–] MrTolkinghoen 2 points 4 months ago

malicious compliance

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

"iGiant eggheads" 😂

I like calling the company "Malus" as that's what the generic, scientific term for an apple is (aka the genus). It sounds quite fitting to how the company operates.

Anti Commercial-AI license