Good on her for owning upto it and him for not making it awkward.
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
733 points (96.6% liked)
Don’t You Know Who I Am?
3783 readers
1 users here now
Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.
Acceptable examples include:
- someone not realising who they’re talking to
- someone acting more important than they are
- someone not noticing a relevant username
- someone not realising the status/credentials of the person they’re talking to
Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.
Rules:
This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:
- Be civil, remember the human.
- No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
- Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
- Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
- Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
- Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
- Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.
PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
🦀🦀🦀🦀
(V) (°,,,,°) (V)
Yeah usually they double down and look way worse. I can appreciate that save
I still think her response is a bit shitty…
Why do you need to be “qualified” to talk about a character arc??
Like, it’s not some obscure term that only film critics know or something only they get to have an opinion on… Seems like some unnecessary gatekeeping.
It's Twitter so everyone is required to be unnecessarily rude
Yeah I had Twitter for all of 20 minutes until I realized that it was all just pure vitriol. I deleted Facebook because I thought it was too bitchy. Twitter was another beast entirely.
load more comments
(5 replies)
She may just be pointing out how buzzwords seem to explode throughout the internet, like when someone mentioned boiling a frog in a pot and now someone shares that exact metaphor in every 1 in 4 threads.
And it isn't even true.
It's usually true about what it's being used as a metaphor for, though. A metaphor doesn't have to be literally true. It just has to make sense.
Like pull yourself up by the boot straps. No one's dumb enough to think it only means "help yourself", right?!
Actually the bootstraps one is a good example of the general public missing the point entirely. Originally, the phrase was used to describe something impossible, and was repeatedly used sarcastically to describe an inherently unjust economic system that makes upward mobility impossible.
Yep, and people still try to use it as a metaphor for something completely different. Just something that no longer makes logical sense all on its own.
What's not true, exactly?
A frog will jump out of a pot of water before its hot enough to kill it.
I think maybe you're not understanding the concept of a metaphor.
I understand metaphors just fine.
"Lightning never strikes the same place twice" is a metaphor that people think is true too, doesn't mean we can't use it.
load more comments
(5 replies)
You're only allowed to discuss topics you have PhD on.
We need to wall off all discussion about all topics to certified experts because democracy works best when no one understands how anything works.
I mean if we're talking about vaccines that could be considered a legitimate point. But we're talking about art.
I know you're being sarcastic but still
Fair point, though I hated how that extended into political questions of vaccines from purely technical ones too often.
My personal view on the internet is that anyone writing in internet is potentially a lobotomized honey melon and not take shit as facts the instant reading it
load more comments
(1 replies)
It was an attempted ad hominem attack which backfired on her. A stupid argument in the first place and even more stupid because she got it wrong.
I'd go much further, unless you're citing yourself as a primary source for a fact, citing your credentials isnt very impressive to me.
Ideas matter - the dumbest SOB can come up with great ideas, and the smartest one can come up with dumb ones. And job experience most definitely doesn't make your opinion valuable - I've seen way too many people bad at their jobs for that
Admitting you're wrong on the internet is so rare. And that's sad to me.
Just admit you're wrong then.
I admit I'm wrong all the time. What in specific would you like me to admit to being wrong about?
Oh yeah, I know someone who named her kid Khaleesi. Oh dear.
But let's be honest if you're going to call your kid Khaleesi that kid was always going to grow to be a stripper. Poor kid. She is going to be in high school before she learns how to lean to spell it.
Just to be nit picky: Khaleesi was a title, like queen or chieftess. The character was named Daenerys Targaryen. So they would technically have not named their child after a character.
Its like calling your son King then.
Or having Lord as a name - which actually used to be somewhat popular in the US.
But no one is going to see it like that, are they? They're going to think about poorly written psycho dragon queen
Name one other Khaleesi.
< puts on geek hat and glasses >
Daenerys met several former khaleesi's when she was brought before the Doth Khaleen. While at this point, their husbands had been killed and they had given up the title of Khaleesi and adopted the new title of Khaleen, they were at one point each a khaleesi.
The only one I can remember by name is, Ornela, the one that befriended Daenerys.
< removes geek hat and glasses >
Ha, I have a strategy for this case:
Ahem.
NEEEERD!
It’s always fascinating to me how people use twitter like a social media platform instead of alerting/breaking news/flash messages system.
I was taught what a character arc was in 9th grade english class. It's not a thing that exclusive to people who write for a living.
The concept of character arcs is also pretty well known, so it's not exactly an intellectual flex
Wait, what happened with Dr Zoid?
He often scuttles away going "whoopwhoopwhoopwhoop"
yeah kind of a dumb response to begin with so it's good she realized
Yeah I am okay with Twatter dying.
Ah whoob whoob whoob indeed sir a whoob whoob indeed.
Talking about character arcs isn't exclusive to just people who write for a living.
As someone who is strictly a viewer, I care deeply about arcs because the story is boring otherwise. I'm not trying to be a story snob or anything, but I wish more people were aware of why they think some movies are boring so we can hold lazy studio 'story-by-committee' writing more accountable.
view more: next ›