What they fear is that the revolutionary nationalist will engage in the same savagery that has marked the European’s “national conquest”. They fear a reverse “Manifest Destiny” or the brown-black version of the “White Man’s Burden”.
Love it, love it to death. You see this kind of energy in say, how Vaush slandered Professor Flowers. Where I feel there needs to be a little bit of construction and sanding, is in this quote: "This should not be taken as a call for “segregation”; it rather points to the fact that the topic of national liberation is specifically for that nation’s people. "
If there's one thing the settler loves, it's invoking the 'they want to segregate the country again' whenever we get on the concept of self-determination and base-building. How do we cleanly, succinctly run the line that we're already segregated, and may as well not even be part of the same nation with how differently the law is applied to us?