KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now)

250 readers

1 users here now

Red alert! For the last six months, EFF, Fight for the Future, ACLU, Woodhull Foundation, and dozens of other groups have been sounding the alarm about several #BadInternetBills that have been put forward in Congress. We’ve made it clear that these bills are terrible ideas, but Congress is now considering packaging them together—possibly into must-pass legislation. We're organizing to keep them from sneaking these bad internet bills through.

This community is for news stories, opinion pieces, and action links about these bad internet bills. Please help get the word out!

And if you use microblogging software like Mastodon, please also check out the #BadInternetBills hashtag.

Icon originally from Why we need to openly protest KOSA on Five Nights at Freddy's Wiki, used by permission.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Congress’s push to protect kids online is at a crossroads (KOSA, US-focused) (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Legislators are considering attaching KOSA (the anti-LGBTQ+ censorship bill, aka the Kids Online Safety Act) to must-pass legislation authorizing the FAA. As EFF points out, the latest version of KOSA is still a censorship bill.

So if you're in the US, it's once again a good time to contact your Congresspeople. EFF's got an action here that makes it makes it easy, and so does https://www.stopkosa.com/

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I like the way the author describes the intentions of the bill at face value (protecting children!) exactly as the authors do, without any journalistic analysis of that being true or not. Could have ended the article with actual information from somewhere like the EFF, but instead, mentioned a concern from a nonprofit that "receives money from tech companies."

What an absolute joke to call this journalism. No wonder they're losing their jobs to algorithmic language models with no concern for anything other than sensible use of English grammar.