this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
97 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9614 readers
129 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

It's the privilege of the imperial core that mediocre people with pale skin get to waste immense resources riding around in giant cages with a few sofas, HVAC, entertainment system, a few tons of metal, chemicals, rubber, etc.

It's not surprise that empire is constantly attacking people and stealing their resources around the globe.

The sad part is that EVs are presented as the path forward when it's just a continuation of car dominance, dependency, destruction, violence, waste, etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As a South American, i'd say those numbers are slightly wrong.

There are pretty much the same amount of people in cars as in public transportation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

It looks like the data is taken from cities alone, which could skew the numbers a little, depending on how much of the population lives outside cities (and how they define what a city is).

Here's the study itself for people that are interested: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024001272

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Scientific research always loses to anecdotal evidence about an entire continent. \s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people hate on modern Arab cities, but they aren't as bad as they may seem. Cities are divided into districts, and each district is more or less self sufficient: bakeries, barber shops, supermarkets, schools, mosques, soccer fields, restaurants, banks, hotels, ... So as child with a bicycle I can reach everywhere I needed to go. It is when moving between districts that it can get tricky since you will have to cross fast moving stroads or highways.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

this is a similar idea to microdistricts that USSR had and seen in China as well. I think it's an excellent way to reduce traffic.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

East Asia is full of small areas with a lot of people crammed into those spaces. North America is the exact opposite.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

North America makes its cities catered to cars rather than people and then people spread out into suburbs. Then North Americans say they can't make the cities suck less because the people are too spread out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

If you compare the population densities of mid-sized American cities, they're not really all that different from Dutch cities that are famed for their bike, public transit, and pedestrian infrastructure. In fact, a lot of cities in the Netherlands as recently as the 70s looked like any old town USA with a bunch of mid-rises choked with cars going down the street. It was, AFAIK, about 20 years of consistent policy choices that changed it to the public transit mothership it is today.

What I mean to say is that our urban design is terrible. It didn't used to be, and it's an issue that impacts a lot of aspects of life in even smaller cities, not least of which is that it makes it far more expensive both for you and the city. We've arrived here by decades of consistent policy choices prioritizing cars over people, and we can get out of it through policy choices, too.

Here's a really good primer on it from a really good channel if you're interested: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJp5q-R0lZ0_FCUbeVWK6OGLN69ehUTVa&si=RPLl3xnLSaFujsld