Programmer Humor

31998 readers

385 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

204

js Monk and Fly (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago

this is the language we were given on the web, not the language we chose

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I can't test it right now but I would love to know. Is it true?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Seems to be so, see Exceptional behavior of document.all

Although document.all is also falsy and loosely equal to undefined, it is not undefined. The case of document.all having type "undefined" is classified in the web standards as a "willful violation" of the original ECMAScript standard for web compatibility.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, it's undefined

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

not strictly

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

typeof x === "undefined" is true.

Then the bastard tries to willingly access x to equate it to undefined, but that can't work since x is undefined and yields a ReferenceError (rendering the third expression moot).

The monks answers of document.all is not applicable since document.all is a live set of data which can be nothing or everything.

Who even introduced document.all? I bet it was microsoft...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The what?? Is it a condition?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Now I'd love to see a Perl monk comic!