Israel would not be able to resist killing UN peacekeepers
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
My prediction: The US will leave the UN to avoid any possibility that they may have to act against Israel killing UN troops, but somehow (read: "we will bathe the world in nuclear hellfire") keep its seat on the UNSC so it can keep veto power on everything they do.
The UN recognizing Palestine obligates the US to stop funding the UN. The US passed a law in 1990 saying any org that recognizes Palestine must have funding pulled. Obama did this with UNESCO. The UN charter states that after 2 years of no funding, a country loses voting rights in the general assembly. There is nothing in the charter about losing security council voting rights
Damn, upgrading "prediction" to "mechanical property of bureaucracy", then.
You fool, you activated my trap card!
Turkey will leave and establish an economic alliance with region around
I can't imagine the UN will do anything. UN Peacekeepers don't exist to stop ACAB nations from doing a genocide.
I also can't imagine the Arab League nations have the political will to work together to oppose Israel on their own, at least not in a way that doesn't result in dragging most of Europe into war.
So what if this keeps escalating? After Trump wins re-election in November and the US, Israel, Germany, Ukraine, Argentina, Australia, Taiwan and probably the UK break away to start their own fascister UN with anyone else dumb enough to join?
It would set the stage for China to take a larger role in the UN, and probably lead to a reunited Ireland and independent Scotland.
Yeah this is just them passing the buck to someone else, I agree
U.N. peace keepers only know to intervene in none of their business
Let's say they were to send "peacekeepers"...
Isreal would just kill them, too. They don't give a fuck.
So Israel can kill them just like how they did in Lebanon?
On one hand, occupying forces are occupying forces and that never seems to go well.
On the other hand, it will result in a whole lot of cracker on cracker violence.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: