this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
29 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

1074 readers
170 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon is upgrading its decade-old Alexa voice assistant with generative AI and plans to charge a monthly subscription fee to offset the cost of the technology.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, time to pay to have your conversations recorded. Had to happen eventually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If there was any reason to believe they wouldn't be selling data anyways, making it a paid thing would make it seem more trustworthy, at least. If it's free, then you have to assume it's generating profit through other means.

Though even if that means of profit is from people using it to make Amazon orders, I still don't trust it because most of the time when I do order something on Amazon, I need to look through a bunch of sketchy results to find one that looks trustworthy. I wouldn't trust a voice assistant to pick a better option, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if the voice assistant is specifically designed to select inventory they have more trouble moving.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if 'basic' Alexa will stay. At home we find it genuinely useful for setting timers and alarms etc. my wife has an obsession with the weather and is always asking for weather info for our area - she doesn't drive and works in an office so it's beyond me.

We have Samsung phones so could resort to Bixby.

The only other thing we use Alexa for is playing music although my Sonos system has it's own voice control for that, although I suspect that may go in a couple of years when they stop supporting my kit, it's five years old now.

I'd rather not resort to Google.

[–] BrikoX 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I certainly will- thank you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait I thought Alexa was a way to make money off people by making it easy to order stuff?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

and now you can pay for that privilege, along with paying them to harvest your data. I guess the "If its free you are the product" no longer stands

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If I remember correctly, that turned out to not work since people apparently don't like ordering via voice interface. Doing it via an app or website tends to be faster and more convenient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

None of my techy friends use Alexa, and the people I know that do almost certainly aren't open to paying a subscription.