Security considerations between Xen vs KVM? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

publication croisée depuis : https://lemmy.world/post/16156662

To be completely open, this is not a question about XCP-ng vs Proxmox. I'm open to doing everything in the cli, comparing two platforms is not my intention here.

I'm very interested in the security benefits one has over the other though. AFAIK Xen has a dedicated for security? I'd like to think that both are reasonably secure by default, but I do not get many hits for "KVM hardening", for example, only OS-level hardening advice.

Do both protect equally against attacks that try to escape the VM? Is there anything in terms of security that one has and the other doesn't?

I know this is not the usual kind of question that is asked on this sub, any help is greatly appreciated!

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

From the FAQ of Qubes OS (i.e. most secure desktop OS for general use):

"Why does Qubes use Xen instead of KVM or some other hypervisor?"

"In short: we believe the Xen architecture allows for the creation of more secure systems (i.e. with a much smaller TCB, which translates to a smaller attack surface). We discuss this in much greater depth in our Architecture Specification document."

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Searching for "XenTCB" already brings a lot of useful results

TCB
breaking up Hypervisors into smaller parts
Xen 4.11 release info
TCB overview
[scientific paper about some more stuff])https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-11203-9_18.pdf)
security in a commodity hypervisor

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

As KVM is part if the Linux kernel, I assume you'll have to look into kernel hardening instead, next to OS hardening. Hardware is also important to consider when talking about VM escaping. A CPU that supports better VM isolation features and encrypted memory

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks, that's a great idea and I'll keep CPU support in mind

[+] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[deleted]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm just being a bit paranoid with my attempts, and yes just KVM on Debian would work perfectly fine for my purposes but I'd like to take the more secure alternative if possible. Another comment about kernel hardening was a good one for KVM, and unfortunately AMD SEV is not available on most of their consumer chips (especially the older generations).

If I were to switch off multi-threading but assign vCPUs to my VM assuming multi-threaded capacity (I.e. assign 12 vCPUs to my lab cluster after switching of SMT for my 6 core CPU), would I face performance issues? I wonder

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024

20 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

45773 readers

979 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]