this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
250 points (92.8% liked)

News

22779 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Good. As an American, I support this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you mean us, we aren't an ICC member.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't see how that is relevant. It's a problem that we're not party to the ICC.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I didn't ratify my city's bullshit zoning laws but they're still a threat to me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The US didn't sign on to the treaty that creates the ICC's jurisdiction. In most countries, you still need to at least pretend to have jurisdiction to bring criminal charges. Unlike people, states can only be sued to the degree they consent to be sued. It's what sovereign immunity is based on and it's a very double-edged sword.

Also, outside of a few warlords, the ICC is pretty bad at enforcing international law because they have no way to do so. The ICC is inefficient and slow. Someone has to actually bring the defendant to them to stand trial, then countries negotiate over who doesn't have to deal with jailing the person if they're convicted.

It's also arguably super imperialist, given that it was designed by a bunch of Western powers and has mostly been used to enforce international law against individuals from Africa. The two Russians who are being "prosecuted," Putin and Lvova-Belova, can't be detained because the ICC has no power to enforce their warrants. Granted, these people are often evil, but it's not like the West doesn't have its fair share of evil people.

All that to say, while this looks good, it's mostly just PR. We also arguably don't want the ICC prosecuting Americans. We should instead make our domestic system better.

Source: Used to work on analyzing ICC cases and I've read thousands of filings from various cases. It's a well-intentioned but highly flawed system that is basically only designed to prosecute international crimes in Africa and doesn't really focus on anything else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Neither are the Israelis, but that doesn't matter, because Palestine is. Well, I say that, but to be fair the US isn't directly operating in Palestinian territory, "merely" aiding and abetting Israeli operations. I personally feel that should count, but I won't be the one arguing in court. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Agreed. I know it's purely wishful thinking, but I dream of a day that our government can be somehow held accountable for war crimes, so that they might actually stop committing them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I do too, but don’t get too excited. At the rate the ICC works, it could take them years to hold trial.

The upside is that this could prompt Biden to mandate the State Department perform a reassessment. Leahy Law can’t be supported by outside intelligence unsubstantiated by the State Department. Once he has a conclusive report, it doesn’t matter what congressional legislation states.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Let's fucking goooo

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

I'm 90% sure that if Sanders was elected president in 2020, the US would have ratified the Rome Statute of the ICC.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not going to happen and the Hague doesn't actually want it to. Unless they want Navy SEALs knocking down their doors.

Look up the American Service-Members Protection Act if you don't believe me.

Note: this is not a policy that I support, but it is official US policy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unless they want Navy SEALs knocking down their doors.

I can hear the chuds screaming "The ICJ is about to find out why we can't afford health care!" from all the way on the other side of the Atlantic.

But Americans sending special forces into the center of Europe to canoe a couple of mid-level paper pushers at the UN over a sternly worded letter would maybe not be the most savvy foreign policy over the long term.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

But Americans sending special forces into the center of Europe to canoe a couple of mid-level paper pushers at the UN over a sternly worded letter would maybe not be the most savvy foreign policy over the long term.

I couldn't agree more!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We’re not members of the ICC

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Neither is Israel

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Good. Let's issue warrants for all current and former presidents too as they're all war criminals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah good luck with that

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Once the US and Russia march in in South Africa, that annoying voice talking about the annoying human rights will be quiet very fast.

Did South Africa forget what they together accomplished against Germany? /s