this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
233 points (96.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A MONAD IS A MONOID IN THE CATEGORY OF ENDOFUNCTORS

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Wow you sound so smart!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Typical Computer science vs typical computer engineering

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Inside me are two wolves I guess…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Chief O’Brien:

Sorry about that transporter malfunction, sir! Won’t happen again!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have to say, I'm getting more and more frustrated by the bad code I have to write due to bad business circumstances.

I want clean, readable code with proper documentation and at least a bit of internal consistency and not the shoehorned mess of hacks, todos and weird corner cases.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

todos

I found a simple trick against this: just remove them. Accept it ain’t gonna happen man.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, yes, but the underlying issues still persist, so it's not exactly a sustainable strategy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It’s mostly a joke, but often when I find todos they’re so old they’re no longer relevant.

Of course you shouldn’t blindly remove todos.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Don't just put "TODO". If they're in the final pull request, they need to mention a ticket that's intended to fix that TODO. If you/your team decides it's not important, then remove it and close out the ticket. Either way, you're required to do something with it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Rust mentioned!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

At least the code on the bottom is actual code and not just signatures

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Instead of

if let Some(a_) = a{
    ()
} else if let Some(b_)=b{
    ()
} else {
    dostuff 
}

you could just use

if a.isNone()&&b.isNone(){
    dostuff
}

Also if you don't use the value in a match just use _

[–] jimitsoni18 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also you can use enums insteas of string literals

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how I would go about this in an elegant way since I'm matching the string I get from a message…

[–] jimitsoni18 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If the message used enums for actions/procedures like SPAM_MEMES, then using enums would be more performant

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I think you'd be happy to know that I've gone for a bit of an overkill and used Pest to parse the commands, which automagically gets me an enum to match against in this position.

The sad part is, I haven't gotten the Media upload to work, so the project is on ice for a little while…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's a good point, thanks. Maybe I'll go without the if entirely, the (janky) code is still very much in flux ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't that construction only work in categories that also contain their own morphisms as objects since a profunctor maps (Cᵒᵖ × C) → Set and not the same like (Cᵒᵖ × C) → C? Since the category of Haskell types special, containing its own morphisms, so the profunctor could be like (haskᵒᵖ × hask) -> hask? or I just don't understand it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Hom functors exist for locally small categories, which is just to say that the hom classes are sets. The distinction can be ignored often because local smallness is a trivial consequence of how the category is defined, but it's not generally true

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

is this a section of a discord api implementation?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Almost, but not quite. It's built against Presage

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't nearly know enough to understand this but is anyone willing to help me get the thing on the top :>

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

To first give you some context, the thing on the top is from The "Representable Functors" chapter of Category Theory for Programmers. So technically, you only need to read 230 Pages of a maths textbook to get it ;)

But this isn't exactly what you asked for, so I'll try to help you get it as best I can with my limited understanding of the subject. First of all it would be helpful to know what your prior knowledge in Maths, especially Set theory, is?