I didn't realize people still played this. Between lack of content and creation credits, I thought this was going to follow Redfalls fate.
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)
Starfield
2877 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Note that they said players, not active players. Thats the main thing.
I got it for free, and honestly I would have loved it years ago. Not as much as other BGS games, but still.
Now... it feels like it should have come out at least 5 years before it did, maybe more? I played the intro and never went back.
I was also kinda put off because it ran like poo on a 7800X3D and a 3090. I finished CP2077 on a freaking laptop 2060, and it actually ran great.
It is available through GamePass, so I imagine quite a few people figured they'd play it for "free."
I have GamePass and I won't waste any space on it. I'll stick to No Mans Sky.
Lack of content? It's a single player game, Skyrim is still super popular after 12 years.
Yes, and Skyrim is miles ahead of this game.
It is, but lack of content is not really an issue for a game like this still.
Good for them
I really enjoyed the first 30 hours I put into it.
I haven't played in a hot minute due to work and housework, but I fully intend to go back and put many more hours into it.