In that case, shouldn’t we start with the Law of Hammurabi? I’m pretty sure it’s older and the direct ancestor of Judaic law. It would be chaos, but that’s the truth.
AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
② All posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
④ All posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
The Law of Harambe? I'm in.
I think it's actually
The law of the jungle
Same! 🍆
First article: Dicks out
Get outta here with your truth and facts, heathen! Only godly and repenting opinions allowed!
Well in that case, the writings of Zarathustra (10th century BC) might be a good starting point
So I got curious:
Law Timeline: https://www.worldhistory.org/timeline/law/
List of ancient legal codes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ancient_legal_codes
In this list is the Law of Moses / Torah (10th to 6th century BC)
And it's definitely not the earliest code of law.
Try again Landry.
Jebus H Christ it's exhausting to live in this country.
Will any of the 10 Commandments apply to Trump or are they just going to continue with “the opposite is fine for political purposes”
Fuck your fairy tales.
So that part where God gives laws to Abraham just doesn't count for this guy? He knows better than his creator I guess?
If you want to base your laws off the OG law giver, them I'm proud to introduce you to my boy Hammurabi!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi
If a man has a debt lodged against him, and the storm-god Adad devastates his field or a flood sweeps away the crops, or there is no grain grown in the field due to insufficient water—in that year he will not repay grain to his creditor; he shall suspend performance of his contract [literally "wet his clay tablet"] and he will not give interest payments for that year.
i guess that position makes all amendments null and void then? including the 2nd to the US constitution?