46
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

Open source people "cheering" for Broadcom and Qualcomm based chips? I'm horribly confused as to when the open source types decided they liked greedy, horrible, shitty companies?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't want arm or risc v to replace x86 unless we still get to have motherboards with upgradable cpu sockets. And ram slots. And gpu compatible pcie slots. None of the current players are going to give us anything like that.

I'd be happy if they even sold hobbiests loose chips so we could figure it out ourself though. The arm and risc microprocessors on mouser are like the bottom of the barrel leftovers after the corpos have had their pick.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

There's stuff for sale like that on the ARM side, but you'll pay out the nose for it, as it's all enterprise-y server-y stuff. For example, you can buy Ampere chips and boards that have ram slots and pci-e slots and all that jazz, but it costs way too much to make any sort of sense at the consumer level.

But yeah, on the consumer side we're never going to get modifiable and upgradable systems from the current crop of SOC vendors, and, worse, the x86 duopoly looks to want to head down the integrated RAM and non-upgradable path too :(

[-] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago

Since forever. Go to any "open source" conference and you might as well be sitting in a Mac conference.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

ARM will replace x86 and RISC V will move into ARM's old slot.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

RISC V is what you’re looking for

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's not even the first time 😭

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

... when it is actually usable one day.

The big problem of RISC-V is the fragmentation of the market, and it is not even a big market to start with.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

RISC-V has already been ruined by a zillion proprietary vendor extensions.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Can the extensions not be replaced?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

no it's part of the physical hardware design

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

What I mean is, given the open source nature of RISC V, if someone puts out a chip with a proprietary extension, isn't it likely that there will be a rip off that does the same but in an alternative manner? Like how there's tonnes of Raspberry Pi like boards available.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The RISC-V is an extensible ISA, so yes. All those vendor extensions are optional, when fabricating the processor, which can be replaced by other extensions over time.

Both Intel and AMD have had vendor extensions in the designs that they no longer use, even ones that have been "retracted" (i.e whatever in the heck Intel is doing with their AVX extensions).

But yeah, currently, there are a lot of proprietary extensions, which could still be declared as open hardware as well. So yeah.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm honestly surprised that RISC V wasn't licensed so that it was only open architecture.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I love seeing ARM wrestling

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
46 points (89.7% liked)

Linux

4446 readers
121 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS