What bullshit to include threads
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
27 points (86.5% liked)
Fediverse
156 readers
8 users here now
Federated universe is a decentralized, federated social media network that is interoperable with each other by using a common protocol.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
3. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
4. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
5. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
6. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Interesting links
- https://fediverse.party - list of Fediverse platforms
- https://joinfediverse.wiki - Fediverse wiki
- https://fedi.tips - tips and guides about Fediverse
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
Not just include it, they describe the Fediverse, right up front, as an escape from corporate controlled spaces, and without a hint of fucking irony, drops Threads as the second "big name".
Since then, myriad decentralized platforms have sprouted, including [...] Threads
How many Threads instances are there?
I don't think they know what "decentralized" means
the fediverse was born — an attempt to wrest control of microblogging services, such as Twitter and its ilk, away from centralized powers and into the hands of the people.
Threads is Meta’s runner in the fediverse race. It uses the ActivityPub protocol, which lets Threads fly the platform interoperability flag the fediverse is known for – although Meta has received some criticism for being slow to fully participate. Still, with the weight of Meta behind it, Threads positions itself as a key player in the evolution of a more connected and diverse online ecosystem.
shut the fuck up, go commit retroactive abortion
I know there are strong feelings about posts that include Threads and to lesser extent Bluesky, but it's important to know what corporate media thinks of Fediverse and how they compare it to corporate alternatives. You are encouraged to dissect the article and point out all of its failures, or just downvote the post and move on. But I won't be removing it.
P.S. The author of the article definitely has a pro VC stance.