272
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 96 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Asked about the overturning of Roe v. Wade, they explained that men cannot get abortions, so it’s only fair that women shouldn’t be able to either, and therefore the court is the epitome of equality"

Choked on my drink

[-] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago

A fine take on this classic:

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.

Anatole France

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

During the gay marriage debate in Canada people were actually arguing that marriage equality already exists, since everyone gay or straight cannot marry people of the same sex, and therefore gay marriage is a special privilege and not equality.

When someone is motivated enough, they can come up with all manner of reasoning in bad faith and not serving justice in any meaningful way, and when they come up with something like this they do nothing but marvel at their own perceived cleverness.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

But not everyone had the right to marry a woman. Typical male privilege.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh you were serious. Well fuck.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago

Checks out, since they have to distract from ruling that gratuities aren't bribes.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Why yes, the curtain is big enough to fit a Winnebago!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Be sure to tip your governor!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

The local Ombudsman is now king of the castle!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I was just going to post that, it seems more like the onion:

Supreme Court wipes out anti-corruption law that bars officials from taking gifts for past favors

In ruling for the former mayor, the justices drew a distinction between bribery, which requires proof of an illegal deal, and a gratuity that can be a gift or a reward for a past favor. They said the officials may be charged and prosecuted for bribery, but not for simply taking money for past favors if there was no proof of an illicit deal.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Poor Sotomayor.

She's the single wise, rational, compassionate justice who not only has to consistently voice and explain the correct rulings that her asshole conservative peers avoid an order to consolidate wealth and power, but she also gets so much collateral shit because she's lumped in with all those assholes.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

the Greatest Mullahs in the western world!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Old Supreme Court pic is old.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Canadian satire site is Canadian.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, and the use of an old pic that leaves out one of the justices they quote is a clever part of the satire and not just an oversight. Genius!

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago

Many thanks! Warm hugs!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair they're only one justice off. Jackson hasn't been on the bench for too long. It's not like they've got Scalia up there.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
272 points (98.6% liked)

The Onion

3958 readers
75 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS