this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

World News

21998 readers
131 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The super-rich respond by raising the prices on pitchforks and torches. When asked, one replies “We must always maximize profits for us shareholders!”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue with revolutions is that while they tend to get rid of old elites, they create a new class of elites out of the top revolutionaries and the cycle just starts over again. Many communist revolutions were supposed to create these theoretically "equal" societies, but they just insert in a new ruling class.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but what are the other possibilities? Let them become kings?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Theoretically, by wiping out the rich would create instability within the wealthy class, they wouldn't have the time or the means to herd the politicians to serve them or to effectively disrupt democracy.

The inheritance that kid collects would amounts to "Congratulation, you won the lottery, now what? You haven't own any corporation yet, know of anything about how to make connections with other politicians and wealthy class of people and so forth. You're pretty much on your own."

Like 70% of the time, those people wouldn't even bother with politic and would just spend the money vacationing where-ever in the world and having fun with the newfound wealth, not busy trying to disrupt democracy. People tend to be very shortsighted when they amasses huge wealth, in fact, according to some statistic, it ranges from 44% to 70% of people who gain huge amount of money end up losing it all within the next 5 years.

That amount of time would basically give the common people enough time to go about fixing the political system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Surely their huge stacks of money will protect them from the bullets, right? Right???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm worried you may be underestimating how many bootlickers would be willing to defend a billionaire in some sort of collapse scenario

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, yes, good luck getting to their closed communities and enwalled houses with panic rooms, personal bodyguards and police / law in their pockets. Did we even have any famous billionaire assassinations in history so far?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would personally prefer to sentence anyone with a net worth of over $1B to a lifetime eating $100 bills until they've literally eaten their fortune. Show them the real value of their monopoly paper, you know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I would prefer guillotines and pikes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing. I sure wish Trevor had stayed with us.