42
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In a May 2000 essay published on his website, Hancock writes: “I have consistently argued that the Americas were inhabited in prehistoric times by a variety of ethnic groups – Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid … Such ideas have caused deep offense to some American Indians, who have long claimed to be the only ‘native’ Americans.”

He goes on to describe various prehistoric artifacts that he says prove the presence of Caucasians and Africans before Columbus landed on the continent in 1492. This includes his research into the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl, who he says was described by the Aztecs as “tall, white-skinned and red bearded – sometimes blue eyed as well”.

I don't ever want to hear that Hancock isn't a racist again.

Edit: I see we have some Hancock fans lurking. Hello! Hope you enjoy the next season despite Hancock not being allowed to be a racist in the Grand Canyon.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"...Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid..."

Holy shit man, we already suspected you were promoting some racist bullshit, but you didn't have to lean into it harder.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Those terms were seriously used in academic circles around 2000 and even more recently as well. There's a weird whole complex theory on the outdated idea. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
42 points (88.9% liked)

Skeptic

1202 readers
33 users here now

A community for taking a critical look at pseudoscience, quackery, and boldfaced BS.

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." ~ David Hume

Things we like:

• Thoughtful discussion
• Humor
• Civility

Things we don't like quite so much:

• Trolling
• Low-effort comments and posts
• Personal attacks
• Spam
• URL shorteners

Carl Sagan's Nine Precepts of Skeptical Thinking:

  1. Confirm the reality (independent of the status quo).
  2. Encourage debate on the evidence by proponents of all points of view.
  3. Avoid appeals to authority.
  4. Recognize that there is always more than one hypothesis.
  5. Do not cling to a hypothesis simply because it is yours.
  6. Attaching a numerical quantity is key to discriminating hypotheses.
  7. In a chain of argument, all the links must work—not just most of them.
  8. Everything else being equal, the simplest explanation is the most likely.
  9. Proposals that cannot be proven or shown to be false do not have much scientific value.

Suggested Fediverse Communities

RFK Jr. Watch @lemm.ee - Tackling misinformation being spread by antivaxxer politician, Robert F Kennedy Jr.
DebunkThis @lemmy.world - an evidence-based community for debunking misinformation and dubious claims.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS