submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

time for big bang revision

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

'Forbidden' black holes? What wrote this headline?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

space.com usual clickbait. half expected them to talk about hungry black holes. not too bad of an article

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

is this the starting point of a new cosmology ?
https://lemmy.world/post/17053001

(physicists) ...these luminous objects do not quite fit comfortably into those theories. ...

Those objects fit comfortably in reality but those theories (Big Bang, LCDM...) do not.

source // open access :
RUBIES: Evolved Stellar Populations with Extended Formation Histories at z ∼ 7–8 in Candidate Massive Galaxies Identified with JWST/NIRSpec https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

seem to need some revision. that's what I like about science. observations revise theories. no unchangable beliefs.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024

23 points (92.6% liked)

science

13629 readers

501 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS