22
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A Conservative minister has said Labour is heading towards "the largest majority this country has ever seen".

Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride not only appeared to concede the election to Labour a day before voting begins but said they would gain a record number of seats.

He told Sky News: "It appears, if the polls are right, that we're heading towards the largest majority that this country has ever seen, much greater than even 1997's landslide."

Mr Stride was talking after other leading Conservatives, including Rishi Sunak, David Cameron and Boris Johnson, have warned of Labour gaining so many seats it would have a "supermajority".

A Survation MRP poll released on Tuesday put Labour on course for a landslide victory, winning 484 of the 650 seats up for grabs, many more than the 418 won by Tony Blair in 1997.

It predicted the Conservatives would win just 64 seats - the fewest since the party was founded in 1834.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

And, remarkably, Labour's main plan seems to have been to keep their head down and let the Tories shoot themselves in the arse, repeatedly.

Labour have hit back at this and earlier claims about a supermajority (which isn't even a thing here) as a form of voter suppression. So keep pushing all the way to the finish line.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

If I was a conservative voter, I'm a bit unclear about why I'm supposed to be more scared of Labour winning by a lot, any more than I would be by Labour just winning at all.

The message from the conservatives seems to be that majorities are bad and super majorities are super bad. Conveniently forgetting they had an 80 seat majority until they biffed it up.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

So excited for our new red tory government

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I see it like this. We are infinitely more likely to get left-wing policies from a centralist government, than left-wing policies from an ultra-nationalist right wing government.

So saying they're all the same is a bit disingenuous. Yes Labour are not what they used to be, but then again neither of the Tories, and that is really the problem we need to deal with right now.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride not only appeared to concede the election to Labour a day before voting begins but said they would gain a record number of seats.

Mr Stride was talking after other leading Conservatives, including Rishi Sunak, David Cameron and Boris Johnson, have warned of Labour gaining so many seats it would have a "supermajority".

A Survation MRP poll released on Tuesday put Labour on course for a landslide victory, winning 484 of the 650 seats up for grabs, many more than the 418 won by Tony Blair in 1997.

During a campaign rally on Tuesday at the National Army Museum in Chelsea, London, Mr Sunak said: "Now, it suits lots of people to say that the result of this election is a foregone conclusion but I know that it is not.

Mr Johnson told the crowd of Conservative Party supporters Sir Keir Starmer would try to "usher in the most left-wing Labour government since the war".

He urged people who want "higher taxes next week, next year" and "uncontrolled immigration and mandatory wokery, and pointless kowtowing to Brussels" to vote Labour.


The original article contains 545 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

2864 readers
592 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS