62
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In other words, which POTUS elections did the (a) general American public at the time see as all candidates being poor options, and (b) do current historians and political scientists generally agree as them having poor candidates?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago

Hayes vs Tilden had neither candidate winning a majority of electoral votes and the election was basically decided by backroom deals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election

[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Progressives in 1968 thought that massive protests in the streets would push the Democrats to the Left.

It didn't work.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

For those wondering

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

A case could be made for 1976. The incumbent Gerald Ford was neither elected president nor vice president, and became VP after Agnew resigned before becoming president after Nixon's resignation. He pardoned Nixon after the Watergate scandal, which was really unpopular with the American people. The challenger Jimmy Carter was an unknown before the Democratic primary, being the Governor of Georgia but was not seen as someone who would be more than that. It was a tight election with Carter barely beating Ford. It's possible a stronger Democratic candidate would've won in a landslide, likewise a stronger Republican incumbent would've probably won easily.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

I understand 1860 was pretty contentious.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
62 points (91.9% liked)

History

4046 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS