65
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Wow, this is some clever legal shit, if I'm grokking it right. And I might be grokking it wrong, so straighten me out if I'm mistaken, please.

A wingnut kills six people at a school, and gets shot dead by cops. As is the style with these things, he leaves behind journals full of hate and wingnuttery. Now, here's where it gets weird: The killer's parents, being decent people, transfer the killer's entire estate, including the writings, to the victims' families, and they go to court asserting that any release of the wingnut writings would violate their copyright, as owners of the estate. The judge agrees, so the journals won't be published, and haters won't get the hate fuel they yearn for.

I ain't sure whether it's right in principle — gets complicated, if you think about the possible precedent. But dang me, it is clever, and if it smothers a dead madman's free speech rights, well, guess I'm OK with that.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
65 points (98.5% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

460 readers
66 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Each player gets six cards, except for the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

All posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

All posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦  
 

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS