this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
28 points (86.8% liked)

Canada

7078 readers
462 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At issue is the NATO two per cent doctrine. That calls for NATO nations to spend two per cent of their GDP on defence.

American politicians, along with retired Canadian generals and Ottawa think tanks who receive funding from the arms industry, have used that to hammer Canada as a failure on defence.

Defence Minister Bill Blair has recounted how hard it is to try to convince cabinet as well as Canadians about the need to meet the two per cent commitment because β€œnobody knows what that means.”

Add to that mix the current fiscal environment and ongoing concerns from Canadians who have been struggling financially. Directing tens of billions of tax dollars into more tanks, submarines and fighter jets isn’t a top priority among Canadian families.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tax the rich more so that we can hit that 2% requirement.

Then we can adequately support Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, we need to remain strong in the face of the fascists who would gladly betray Canada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We do. And, they will if given the opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree that force is the only language fascists understand, But what would preparing Canada for a US invasion look like?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn't be enough. We would go down fighting. Half of the people here are so brainwashed, they'd be more likely to team up with the trump/putin alliance than defend Canada. It looks bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

...

No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn't be enough.

So how much should we build up? Or did you mean build up international alliances?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both. We can build up enough to fight back with allies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We would not get state level military support from any ally. China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Cuba might help us.

The type of build up that would be effective (if it could even be called that) against a US invasion would be sapping roads and bridges like Switzerland, and transforming our army into a resistance/insurgency force. Should we re allocate our spending towards these aims?

It seems a little premature.

Maybe we should actually invest in helping Canadians (and Americans) engage with and value democracy and human rights.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China, Russia, North Korea are allied with rapist donald trump. If he were to order an attack on Canada, they will side with him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are allied with him because he weakens America. If America invaded Canada, China and Russia would probably support both sides to make America look bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Naa. They are with trump and he is with them.