161
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Probably a planning requirement so it didn’t block the light hitting the stained glass window?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

It's a downward angle, looks specifically like it's there for pedestrians (or maybe something specific along that path)

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

I wondered if it was something to do with Londons protected sight lines, but turns out it’s just good neighbours.

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2024/feb/06/attacked-by-an-ice-cream-scoop-the-story-of-londons-gouged-building-union-street

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That's great to hear.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Wow, they chose the more expensive and more gentle way to do it? I wonder if there was a design committee that made them or it was just a love of architecture.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I don't know for certain in this case but almost certainly legal there's a bunch of sightlines in london that are protected and you aren't allowed to block them

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's incredibly interesting, rules makes for wild and creative solutions.

Edit: Unless it's an HOA, lol. They fine you for being creative.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The article didn't talk about it being required but more of a benevolence. There were certainly examples of required lines of sight, specifically old St. Paul's, however

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
161 points (97.1% liked)

London

1004 readers
2 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS