this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
90 points (95.0% liked)

Work Reform

9686 readers
973 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lawyers are one of the few workers who get paid proportionally to the value they produce. It's just that the value they produce has grown exponentially high since they represent people and corporations with ridiculous sums of money.

A good example is the case where Elon Musk sued the law firm that the former Twitter owners used to force Musk into buying Twitter. Musk argued that the $90 million payment to the law firm was way too much money. The law firm argued the deal was worth $44 billion, making their payment just 0.2% of the value they created for their client. Courts agreed the law firm did not overcharge.

If each worker for Amazon got paid 0.2% of Amazon's yearly revenue, they'd all make over $1 million a year. The problem is they have so many employees that Amazon can't actually give each of them 0.2%.

Another example is the two Trump defamation cases. The first case was put on hold because he was president. The second case was after he was no longer president. Courts eventually ruled both cases could proceed, so it was a rare time when someone got tried for the same thing twice. Trump used two different lawyers when arguing these cases. One case resulted in a $5 million decision and the other resulted in an $83.3 million decision. It's a great example of the value of a good lawyer. These cases were identical except for Trump's lawyer. One lawyer can generate $78.3 million in value. It's hard to find any other profession where a single person can generate that much value in a few months.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel an exception class actions. Lawyers walk away with way too much of damages that should be going to victims. If it were that same .2% it would be ok, but it's not. It's on average 25-30% of the total fee, and that's disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

You should be focusing your frustration on the other side that makes these lawyers so valuable. Insurance companies often knowingly deny valid claims and significantly under offer early settlements. If we held insurers to a higher standard of accuracy and penalized them whenever a jury finding was much higher than a settlement offer then lawyers would be less necessary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

People in a class aren't going to get much typically. The point of class action is to entice lawyers to sue to fight small sized but widespread harm.

Especially now that the Supreme court has blocked regulators, class action will be one of the few ways left to stop widespread abuse.